If you knew my thoughts; the dreams that absorb me; and the fiery imagination that at times eats me up and makes me feel Society as it is, wretchedly insipid you would pity and I dare say despise me. (C. Brontė, 10 May 1836)
Before Charlotte Brontė wrote her first novel for publication, she admitted her mixed feelings about imagination. Brontės letter shows that she feared both pity and condemnation. She struggled to attend to the imaginative world that brought her pleasure and to fulfill her duties in the real world so as to avoid its contempt. Brontės early correspondence attests to her engrossment with the Angrian world she created in childhood. She referred to this world as the infernal world and to imagination as fiery, showing the intensity and potential destructiveness of creativity. Society did not draw Brontė the way that the imagined world did, and in each of Brontės four mature novels, she recreated the tricky navigation between the desirable imagined world and the necessary real world. Each protagonist resolves the struggle differently, with some protagonists achieving more success in society than others. The introduction of this dissertation provides critical and biographical background on Brontės juxtaposition of imagination/desire and reason/duty. Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubars The Madwoman in the Attic supplies the basis for understanding the ways that the protagonists express imagination, and John Kucichs Repression in Victorian Fiction defines the purposefulness of repression. The four middle chapters examine imaginations manifestations and purposes for the protagonists. The final chapter discusses how the tension caused by the competing desires to express and repress imagination distinguishes Brontės style.
