Electronic Theses and Dissertation Database
Library Home  |  ` Library Catalog  |  ETD Home  |  Browse ETDs  |  Search ETDs  |  ETD Resources

Title page for ETD etd-06192008-143932


Type of Document Dissertation
Author Taratoot, Cole Donovan
Author's Email Address coletaratoot@yahoo.com
URN etd-06192008-143932
Title Administrative Law Judge Decision Making in a Political Environment, 1991 - 2007
Degree Ph.D.
Department Political Science
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Robert M. Howard Committee Chair
David C. Nixon Committee Member
Richard N. Engstrom Committee Member
Scott E. Graves Committee Member
Keywords
  • administrative law judge
  • national labor relations board
  • agency
  • Congress
  • President
  • bureaucracy
  • courts
  • federal circuit courts of appeals
Date of Defense 2008-04-30
Availability unrestricted
Abstract
Unelected bureaucrats make a broad range of important policy decisions raising concerns of accountability in a democratic society. Many classics in the literature highlight the need to understand agency decisions at stages prior to the final vote by agency appointees, but few studies of the bureaucracy do so. To this point, scholars have treated the issue of shirking as one where laziness and inefficiency are the driving forces. However, it is more realistic to expect that shirking comes in the form of ideological resistance by administrators. I develop a theory that the independence afforded to the bureaucracy is functionally comparable to that of the judiciary, allowing for the insertion of individual attitudinal preferences by bureaucrats. Drawing from the attitudinal model of judicial research, I look at whether attitudes affect the decision making of administrative law judges at the National Labor Relations Board, the influence administrative law judge decisions have on reviewing bodies, and whether attitudinal decision making can be controlled by external political and legal actors. Results demonstrate that Democratic judges are more likely than Republican judges to rule for labor in unfair labor practice cases, administrative law judge decisions provide the basis for subsequent decisions of reviewing bodies, and that few political and legal controls exist over this set of bureaucrats. This research provides evidence that lower level bureaucrats make decisions based on their own political preferences and that these preferences have far ranging consequences for policy and law.
Files
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  taratoot_cole_d_200808_phd.pdf 926.17 Kb 00:04:17 00:02:12 00:01:55 00:00:57 00:00:04

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

Click here to send a comment to ETD Support