Electronic Theses and Dissertation Database
Library Home  |  ` Library Catalog  |  ETD Home  |  Browse ETDs  |  Search ETDs  |  ETD Resources

Title page for ETD etd-08142007-164744


Type of Document Dissertation
Author Poddar, Amit
Author's Email Address apoddar1@gmail.com
URN etd-08142007-164744
Title Structure and Process of Channel Program Selections: Retailers Choice among Parity Trade Promotions
Degree Ph.D.
Department Marketing
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Dr. Naveen Donthu Committee Chair
Dr. Dan Bello Committee Member
Dr. Detmar Straub Committee Member
Dr. James Boles Committee Member
Keywords
  • Calculative Commitment
  • Channels
  • Parity promotions
  • Trade promotions
Date of Defense 2007-06-13
Availability unrestricted
Abstract
ABSTRACT

STRUCTURE AND PROCESS OF CHANNEL PROGRAM SELECTIONS: RETAILER’S CHOICE AMONG PARITY TRADE PROMOTIONS

By

AMIT PODDAR

13th June 2007

Committee Chair: Dr. Naveen Donthu

Major Department: Marketing

This research tried to explain the role of calculative commitment, loyalty commitment and power asymmetry on behavioral commitment in a business to business scenario. We specifically looked at the trade promotion scenario since retailers face more trade promotions than they can accept and extant research suggests that retailers always choose trade promotions that offer the greatest immediate benefit. This dissertation addressed the following managerial question, “How does a firm select a program (trade deal) when all its vendors offer the same short term economic incentives”. We proposed that other aspects of retailer’s relationship with its vendors determine / influence the program selection decision. First, incentives imbedded in channel relationships namely economic incentives (e.g., access to new products) and social incentives (e.g., affect toward vendor / salesperson) lead to a selection decision. Second, the power asymmetry the retailer has with the various vendors directly impacts decision making and also moderates the impact of the embedded economic / social incentives. We used commitment theory and an experimental design to test our model. We find that calculative commitment has the greatest impact on decision making followed by power asymmetry. We also find that loyalty commitment has the least impact. We also found that under high power asymmetry, calculative commitment has a bigger impact than loyalty commitment on behavioral commitment than under low power asymmetry when loyalty commitment has a bigger impact.

Files
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  poddar_amit_200708_phd.pdf 610.47 Kb 00:02:49 00:01:27 00:01:16 00:00:38 00:00:03

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

Click here to send a comment to ETD Support